Back to overview →
Module 04 / 04
What must be demonstrated before the next stage?
The implementation must stay within defined error bounds relative to the mathematical golden model.
Verification gates.Open section
Evidence gate
What must be demonstrated before the next stage?
01
Numerical equivalence
The implementation must stay within defined error bounds relative to the mathematical golden model.
02
Fault response
Known degradation classes must produce the expected state transitions and fallback behaviour.
03
Timing
Decision, validation, switching and rollback paths are measured independently.
04
Physical validation
Claims remain bounded until HIL and damaged-plant experiments reproduce the expected behaviour.
Scalability
Per-step computational structure.
| Component | Time | Space |
|---|---|---|
| State estimation | \(\mathcal O(n^3)\) | \(\mathcal O(n^2)\) |
| Indicator computation | \(\mathcal O(r)\) | \(\mathcal O(r)\) |
| Regime classification | \(\mathcal O(1)\) | \(\mathcal O(1)\) |
| Control computation | \(\mathcal O(nm)\) | \(\mathcal O(nm)\) |
| Degradation update | \(\mathcal O(r)\) | \(\mathcal O(r)\) |
| Total | \(\mathcal O(n^3+r)\) | \(\mathcal O(n^2+r)\) |
Evidence boundary
What is not yet demonstrated.
Plant fidelityThe reported comparative study uses a simplified scalar plant for parameter studies.
Failure-model coverageThe degradation laws assume known failure mechanisms and parameterized progression.
Physical validationHardware-in-the-loop / representative-plant validation remains a required next step.
Implementation support · Contimech.org
Translate the research into testable technology.
Contimech.org supports the C++ / ROS 2 reference implementation, test infrastructure and exploratory RISC-V / SoC engineering. This work is part of technology formation, not a commercial offering.