Control after failure.
A survivability-oriented control framework for systems that may lose hardware, model validity or control authority — and must continue through formally admissible architectural change.
CURRENT STATE: UNIFIED SCIENTIFIC FRAMEWORK + REFERENCE TECHNOLOGY UNDER DEVELOPMENT
Preserve the verified mission after the system changes.
The system may lose an actuator, a sensor, communication, compute capacity — or the validity of the models through which it interprets the world. Væringjar II treats all of these as changes in the resource state and searches only inside a design-time verified graph of configurations.
The initial model became a special case of the current one.
Trace the change →Væringjar is not a site built to defend a frozen idea. Experiments are allowed to expose missing assumptions. Earlier formulations are preserved, the turning point is documented, and the scientific model is revised when the evidence requires it.
The scientific model has been revised; implementation now follows the revised constraints.Open section
The scientific model has been revised; implementation now follows the revised constraints.
Mission → Function → Service → Resource.Open section
Mission → Function → Service → Resource.
The hierarchy now includes physical and epistemic resources. Runtime control operates over a finite configuration graph whose edges carry stability and timing conditions.
Architecture →We need hard systems, not easy demos.Open section
We need hard systems, not easy demos.
Robotic systems
Manipulator and mobile-platform cases where actuator, sensor, compute or communication loss changes the achievable control problem.
Research track →Aerospace & unmanned systems
Flight-control cases where degraded actuation, sensing, power or communication still leaves residual control authority.
Research track →Other critical systems
Systems where immediate shutdown is not always the safest or operationally acceptable response to partial failure.
Open problem →Make the research traceable while it grows.Open section
Make the research traceable while it grows.
Definitions, models, equations, assumptions and peer-reviewed outputs.
Software architecture, test gates, experimental artefacts and later hardware prototypes.
Selected problems are developed through PhD and MSc research work under Dmytro Humennyi's supervision.
The current priorities are scientific quality, implementation evidence, reproducibility and serious research partnerships.
Research question or validation case?
Væringjar II is open to scientific dialogue, critique, joint experiments and long-term research partnerships. There is no commercial offering at this stage.
Independent research, open engineering notes, traceable evolution.
Væringjar II publishes the model, experiments, implementation path and teaching material in one place. Share it, cite it, or bring a hard system that needs to keep working after degradation.