← Framework overview
Introductory article

Measuring remaining mission capability

A plain-language introduction to the metric S(t) and its limitations.

From resource to mission

The dissertation connects four levels: resources → services → functions → mission. A resource failure propagates through the services and functions that depend upon it, potentially limiting mission capability.

Structural availability is not the same as actual quality: a configuration may contain the required modules but still perform poorly because its resources have degraded.

The survivability measure

\[ S(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}\alpha_j\,\delta_j(cfg(t))\,\varphi_j(t,cfg(t)) \]

Here:

  • S(t) is survivability at time t, between 0 and 1;
  • αj is the mission priority of function j;
  • δj indicates whether the function is enabled;
  • φj describes its integrity given the available resources.

Three different quantities

\[ 0\le S(t)\le\overline{S}(cfg)\le\Phi(cfg)\le 1 \]

Φ(cfg) is structural function availability, S̄(cfg) is the configuration's nominal upper bound, and S(t) is its current actual survivability. They must not be confused.

For detailed conditions, see capability and admissibility.